> On 26 Oct 2019, at 23:08, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "[Physical science] was designed to give mathematical models that can > accurately predict the behavior of matter, and that's gone really well, but > it was never designed to deal with the subjective qualities of > consciousness." (@Philip_Goff) > https://edge.org/conversation/philip_goff-a-post-galilean-paradigm >
Yes. Physical science was not designed to talk about (Plato’s) ideas, only Aristotle matter. That is why it has never got the vocation of a theory of everything, unlike metaphysics and theology. But physicalist makes physics into a theology, which might make sense, but not if we assume that the brain is Turing emulable in a way relevant for getting a conscious person. That is not obvious, but result for the UDA. (Universal Dovetailer Argument or Paradox). Bruno > @philipthrift > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/77b32b46-4bb5-4bae-a62f-07344de30a6c%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/77b32b46-4bb5-4bae-a62f-07344de30a6c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/914519D3-2A27-4201-A56E-1D400C5D9B7D%40ulb.ac.be.
