On 1/19/2020 2:44 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, January 19, 2020 at 11:52:18 AM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



    On 1/18/2020 11:58 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Sunday, January 19, 2020 at 12:18:54 AM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



        On 1/18/2020 10:56 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:

            I don't claim anything except that GR has solutions for
            a cosmos in which space is flat and, in that solution,
            space is infinite and empirically it appears that space
            is flat.


        *Measurements don't establish it's flat, as I previously
        argued. And, as you previously stated, the sign of k, the
        parameter in GR intimately associated with curvature, is
        folded into the initial conditions. But since the initial
        conditions are really unknown, or are speculative, you can
        assume initial conditions which satisfy your bias, in this
        case FLAT. AG *

        No. It's not an assumption.  Empirically the universe appears
        flat, which (assuming the FLRW model)  implies it was always
        flat.  It is not a question of assuming an initial condition,
        it is inferring the initial condition from present
        measurements of k.


    *This seems to modify what you wrote a few day ago. In any event,
    "empirically" means "measurement", and one cannot measure the
    curvature as exactly zero, which is what you need to empirically
    establish flatness. The measurements are very close to zero, but
    not zero.  AG*

    When you measure something and it is so close to zero as to be
    indistinguishable from zero, then taking it to be zero is not an
    assumption.

    Brent


*But it could be HUGELY spherical and seem to be zero! *

That's right it COULD! But that's not the way to bet and just because it could wrong doesn't make it an assumption. The whole theory of general relativity not only could be wrong, we in fact know it must be wrong at sufficiently short distances.

*The cases could be indistinguishable. What I want to know is this; when you solve using the FLRW model, does it give exactly zero for the curvature? TIA, AG
*

Solutions exist for all different curvatures.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5E24EA5A.6050905%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to