On 1/19/2020 6:57 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Sunday, January 19, 2020 at 4:46:41 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



    On 1/19/2020 2:44 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Sunday, January 19, 2020 at 11:52:18 AM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



        On 1/18/2020 11:58 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Sunday, January 19, 2020 at 12:18:54 AM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



            On 1/18/2020 10:56 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:

                I don't claim anything except that GR has solutions
                for a cosmos in which space is flat and, in that
                solution, space is infinite and empirically it
                appears that space is flat.


            *Measurements don't establish it's flat, as I
            previously argued. And, as you previously stated, the
            sign of k, the parameter in GR intimately associated
            with curvature, is folded into the initial conditions.
            But since the initial conditions are really unknown, or
            are speculative, you can assume initial conditions
            which satisfy your bias, in this case FLAT. AG *

            No. It's not an assumption.  Empirically the universe
            appears flat, which (assuming the FLRW model)  implies
            it was always flat.  It is not a question of assuming an
            initial condition, it is inferring the initial condition
            from present measurements of k.


        *This seems to modify what you wrote a few day ago. In any
        event, "empirically" means "measurement", and one cannot
        measure the curvature as exactly zero, which is what you
        need to empirically establish flatness. The measurements are
        very close to zero, but not zero.  AG*

        When you measure something and it is so close to zero as to
        be indistinguishable from zero, then taking it to be zero is
        not an assumption.

        Brent


    *But it could be HUGELY spherical and seem to be zero! *

    That's right it COULD!  But that's not the way to bet and just
    because it could wrong doesn't make it an assumption. The whole
    theory of general relativity not only could be wrong, we in fact
    know it must be wrong at sufficiently short distances.

    *The cases could be indistinguishable. What I want to know is
    this; when you solve using the FLRW model, does it give exactly
    zero for the curvature? TIA, AG
    *

    Solutions exist for all different curvatures.


*OK, but what value of curvature does the FLRW model give? AG
*

All different ones, depending on what you assume about the cosmological constant, the state function of matter, etc.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5E2534AA.8040603%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to