On 1/25/2020 6:10 PM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:


On Saturday, January 25, 2020 at 6:49:36 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:



    On 1/25/2020 4:32 PM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:


    On Saturday, January 25, 2020 at 6:23:54 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:

        On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:21 PM Bruce Kellett
        <[email protected]> wrote:

                >> And I've heard a bunch of bad analogies but I still
                haven't heard a direct answer to my question:
                What is the difference between a "finite" universe
                that is expanding and accelerating forever and an
                infinite universe that is expanding and accelerating
                forever?

            /> If you don't understand Brent's answer in terms of the
            range of values in coordinate maps, then you will never
            understand the difference./


        Then I guess I'll never understand the difference.

            > A finite universe has a finite range of coordinate values.


        NOPE! Brent specifically said"/I'm assuming a continuum
        spacetime. So even a 1cm interval takes an infinite
        *number* of labels/".  Thus even if the universe is not
        expanding at all and even if it's only 1cm across a infinite
        number of labels with a infinite rage of coordinate values
        printed on them would be needed.


    Nope. Space and spacetime are an epiphenomenology. They are
    mental perceptual models that result from large N-entanglements
    of quantum states. There are no infinite sets of points and
    labels, that would in fact be uncountably infinite. These things
    only exist in our mathematical representations or axiomatic
    systems. Now, what information we can get about space from the IR
    domain of energy at extreme distances, such as with burstars
    etc,, is the representation of what we call space being smooth
    fits the data. This does not mean that fundamentally there is an
    actual smooth continuum of space.

    I don't disagree, but you're getting further and further from
    saying what it means for spacetime to be finite versus infinite. 
    Since it's our mathematical model, that should have a simple
    mathematical answer.

    Brent


There seems to be some sort of issue with the idea of continuum or space having an infinite number of points. I see this as a modern day version of asking how many angels can dance on a pin.

I have no issue with it.  But it doesn't mean that a spherical spacetime is infinite.  The infinity of metric distance in a Riemannian space is not the same as the infinite cardinality of point in a real interval.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4e316406-8c61-acdf-1f04-cba570cd7de1%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to