On 2/7/2020 7:47 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:


On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 5:59:39 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:


    I don't think MWI is that much worse than other interpretations.
    In fact I tend to see it as better than most.

    LC



It is sad (to me) to think that 100 years from now there will be any MWI adherents - except as some curious  cult.

Sean Carroll promotes on his Twiiter (I follow him just to see what nutty thing he says) that he looks forward to the day where all physicists are /Mad-Dog Everettians/.

*Mad-Dog Everettianism*: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08132

It is not only a rabbit hole, it is a cult that has taken over physicists (a lot of them anyway).

It's not only MWI, it's also the infinite universe where there are infinitely many copies of you and where everything happens.  And the multiverse where all possible (mathematically consistent?) universes exist.  We need a way to think about these "infinities".  Are they meaningful?  What would it mean to get rid of them and theorize that everything is finite?  Are there some intermediate options?  Where are the meta-physicists when you need them?

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4ec1717b-cbae-f505-0b45-a3bd92118261%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to