> On 11 Feb 2020, at 22:56, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:04 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > With QM, the number of branch is arguably equal to 2^aleph_0, but with > Mechanism it might need to be bigger than that. > > Then you theory is not unitary. And it cannot be based on unitary evolution > via that Schrodinger equation.
In which theory? Why 2^aleph_0 continuation is incompatible with unitarity. On the contrary, the MWI is derived from accepting that the couple (observer + observed) is unitary. Bruno > > Bruce > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSTbN988TJxG-ZJMSDMno5YZrwdKztxP1eO9hdtUJ8CjA%40mail.gmail.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSTbN988TJxG-ZJMSDMno5YZrwdKztxP1eO9hdtUJ8CjA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/AE791527-B87D-4D1E-8367-AFB1F9AA7BA4%40ulb.ac.be.
