On Monday, February 17, 2020 at 9:27:42 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
> Many worlds are for people who loathe uncertainty and long for
> determinism. But for theories with collapse there is a problem of
> explicating the collapse as a physical process (not just a mathematical
> projector). I'm reading Ruth Kastner's "Transactional Interpretation". TI
> depends on the absorption of some quantum of energy to mark the collapse of
> the wf. She postulates a "possibility space" (sort of like Hilbert space)
> which is "real" but not "actual" in which possible interactions are defined.
>
> Brent
>
>
>
Ruth Kastner's possibility space is more compatible with Henry Wilkes
quantum measure space ("co-event interpretation of Quantum Measure Theory").
https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/10044/1/70797/1/Wilkes-H-2019-PhD-Thesis.pdf
@philipthfit
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f8577d2b-24b1-445a-8c7e-8693078e8628%40googlegroups.com.
