On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 8:43 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > that argument was semi-respectable when weird quantum effects first >> started to show up around the turn of the 20th century but has not been >> respected among physicists for more than 50 years. Your explanation is >> rejected because it just doesn't jive with experimental observations. >> > > > Try being specific, and stop the hydroelectric BS. > A hydroelectric dam producing electricity and the accelerating expansion of the universe caused by the intrinsic energy of empty space, both convert negative gravitational potential energy into positive kinetic energy that can do work, in the first case by falling inward and in the second case by falling outward. And I explained previously to you exactly why that is so. And that is no BS. >> There is simply no doubt about it, Bell's Inequality is violated. >> > > *> What has the ignorance interpretation of superposition before > measurement has to do with Bell's Inequality?* > I see no point in explaining that to you, again, when you'll just ask the exact same question, again, assuming you'd even read my response which I doubt because it sure doesn't look like you have in the past. You have access to all the world's knowledge at your fingertips through the Internet, so do your homework and educate yourself. Then we'll talk. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3BCRvse1cNr92LGW7EzuSjRadmGnzsDT-pfNx6hYLb-A%40mail.gmail.com.
