On 7/4/2021 1:29 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 3:36 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        >> I think I mentioned before that in David Deutsch's book "The
        Ghost In The Atom" he proposed an experimental test that would
        be very difficult, but not impossible, to performthat could
        decide between Copenhagen and Many Worlds; and the reason it's
        so difficult is not Many Worlds fault, the reason is that the
        conventional view says conscious observers obey different laws
        of physics, Many Worlds says they do not, so to test who's
        right we need a mind that uses quantum propertiesand
        algorithms. An intelligent quantum computer shoots photons at
        a metal plate one at a time that has 2 small slits in it, and
        then the photons hit a photographic plate. Nobody looks at the
        photographic plate till the very end of the experiment. The
        quantum mind has detectors near each slit so it knows which
        slit the various photons went through. After each photon
        passes the slits,but before they hit the photographic
        plate,the quantum mind signs a document saying that it has
        observed each and every photon and knows which slit each
        photon went through. It is very important that the document
        does NOT say which slit a photon went through, it only says
        that itwent through one slit and only one slit and the mind
        has knowledge of which one. There is a signed document to this
        effect for every photon it shoots.Now the mind uses quantum
        erasure to completely destroy its memory of which slit any of
        the photons went through; the only part remaining in the
        universe is the document which states that each photon went
        through one and only one slit and the mind (at the time) knew
        which one. Now develop the photographic plate and look at it.
        If you see interference bands then the Many World
        interpretation is correct. If you do not see interference
        bands then there are no worlds but this one and the
        conventional quantum interpretation is correct.This works
        because in the Copenhagen interpretation when the results of a
        measurement enters the consciousness of an observer the wave
        function collapses, in effect all the universes except one
        disappear without a trace so you get no interference. In the
        Many Worlds model all the other worlds will converge back into
        one universe because information on which slit the various
        photons went through was the only thing that made one universe
        different from another, so when that was erased they became
        identical again and merged, but their influence will still be
        felt, you'll see ambiguous evidence that the photon went
        through slot A only and ambiguous evidence it went through
        slot B only, and that's what causes the interference pattern.

    /> And it doesn't work because it assumes that which-way can be
    both observed and yet quantum erased. That's contrary to
    decoherence theory of "observed"/


I don't know what you're talking about. An intelligent quantum computer is perfectly capable of creating a document specifying that at a certain time it had information in its memory banks that indicated which slot a photon went through but not actually mentioning which slot it was,

That's the step that I doubt can be implemented within QM.  Of course it can record quasi-classically (so it can be read out) every time it detects a which-way and it can maintain a count of them.  But it isn't conscious of the which-way values, only that they were counted.  So the interference pattern showing up at the end doesn't do anything to invalidate Copenhagen or similar interpretations.


and at a later time a quantum computer is also capable of using quantum erasure to remove that which way information from its memory banks so there  no longer exists information anywhere about which slit the photon went through, although there is still knowledge that at one time that information was in its memory banks.

    >///and assumes some magic "quantum consciousness", hiding the
    problem behind a lack of definition of consciousness./

Wow, asenigmatic and bazaar as your first remark was, this one is even more so! The entire point of this experiment is to determine if conscious stuff operates according to the same laws of physics as non-conscious stuff, I'm betting that they do.

So am I.  Conscious stuff works by decohering quantum superpositions.  That's why you're never conscious of being in the trillions of multiple-worlds you suppose exist.

Brent



John K Clark    See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
lts9

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2dpEVC%2BPwioAm9K%3D_Wsc4F5EiBCLrv8%3DY-RQ%3DxzQEwuw%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2dpEVC%2BPwioAm9K%3D_Wsc4F5EiBCLrv8%3DY-RQ%3DxzQEwuw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b1893039-baa1-6bf5-4e60-be221b41f093%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to