Only thru you ideological eyes my good man. A "good scientist" usually caves when threatened with loss of tenure from his equally progressive peers, and the administrations. 20 years ago Climate Scientists insisted that drastic climate change was an imminent thing. There fearless forecasts have not materialized, nor have any apologies. The truth is different than what was announced. The truth now seems different with herd immunity and by my count, zero announcements of any corrections from Fauci. Although I did provide you with his admittance that unlike he said to the public, when he said it was only 75% when he really knew it was 90%. That's just the ideologically corrupted scientists. Dem politicians will never ever say:Street crime bad and getting worse.Inflation getting higher.Logistics getting way worse supplies. Afghan withdrawal not so good.Open borders (de facto) troublesome (dems see future voters).
If one has a political stake in a problem never being remediated, yes, then as Rahm Emanuel once said" "Never let a good crisis go to waste." Caveat, this will only apply to a certain percentile of the voter, only for a specified while. -----Original Message----- From: John Clark <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Sep 16, 2021 9:01 am Subject: Re: NYTimes.com: White House Seeks $65 Billion for ‘Apollo’ Plan to Prepare for Future Pandemics On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 6:49 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > It basically comes down to a mistrust of the edicts of of Elite Class of > medicals and governmentals' a plurality of the public has ceased to trust > them [...] Please note that the CDC came out in he last 48 hours indicated > that the booster shots were not needed at this time, and this after 2 months > of belligerent liberal Media howling's about the imminent need of a booster > shot. [...] Behaviorally this is what happens when the populace loses > confidence in the leadership. Republicans are upset because scientists don't behave the same way that politicians do. When new information becomes available a good scientist is capable of admitting he is wrong and changing his worldview, even radically, but a right wing politician never lets new facts have any effect whatsoever upon his opinions, probably because facts had nothing to do with him forming those opinions in the first place. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropoliscnx -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2afRV36TJ%2B6zJY-884es%3DXtY6ij010ci8p8Rwk3B%2BCbQ%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1272464661.822822.1631916493078%40mail.yahoo.com.
