Yet advances in the prowess of digital computing leaps ahead. Making me wonder if quantum computing has become the nuclear fusion of the computing world? The Convergence of the Digital With the Physical and the Biologicalhttps://www.infotoday.com/OnlineSearcher/Articles/Technology-and-Power/The-Convergence-of-the-Digital-With-the-Physical-and-the-Biological-148822.shtml "If recent advances in digital technologies are truly taking us beyond the digital revolution, that is a sufficient reason for libraries to take heed of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. What does it exactly mean that the lines between the physical, the digital, and the biological spheres are getting blurred? How will that relate to the future of libraries? What kind of libraries would be appropriate for the world in which the digital blur and mix into the physical and the biological and vice versa?"
-----Original Message----- From: John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Wed, Oct 6, 2021 7:58 am Subject: Quantum Computers The difficulty in maintaining quantum coherence is the only reason we don't have practical quantum computers today, but Monday's issue of the journal Nature reported on a major advance in solving that problem. For the first time it has been proven that a quantum error correcting code called the "Bacon-Shor code" actually works in practice and not just in theory. They combined 9 physical Qubits that work correctly 98.9% of the time to make one virtual logic Qubit that works correctly 99.4% of the time, and that virtual logic Qubit would be the one you would use in an actual computation. Until now nobody has been able to prove that a logical Qubit can be made that is more reliable than any of the parts it is made out of. This illustrates how different the quantum world is from the macro world we're accustomed to. If 9 people on an assembly line install a part into a machine and install the part correctly 98.9% of the time then the probability the entire finished machine will work correctly is only (0.989)^9 = 90.5% , but if the workers lived in the quantum world and they assemble the parts the way that Bacon-Shor tells them to then the finish machine will work correctly 99.4% of the time not 90.5%. The best thing is that although there are still engineering problems to solve there doesn't seem to be any fundamental reason Bacon-Shor can't be scaled up. Kenneth Brown, what are the authors of the paper, says: "What's amazing about fault tolerance is it's a recipe for how to take small unreliable parts and turn them into a very reliable device. And fault-tolerant quantum error correction will enable us to make very reliable quantum computers from faulty quantum parts. The key part of quantum error correction is redundancy, which is why we needed 9 qubits in order to get one logical qubit. That redundancy helps us look for errors and correct them, because an error on a single qubit can be protected by the other eight." Laird Egan, another author of the paper says: "This is really a demonstration of quantum error correction improving performance of the underlying components for the first time. It's really a proof of concept that quantum error correction works. It shows that we can get all the pieces together and do all the steps. And there's no reason that other platforms can't do the same thing as they scale up." Fault-tolerant control of an error-corrected qubit John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2jkW%2BHMYq-FfM-kWodhbmEmwMWjL%3DiUzXuvthtt6BYvA%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2117307871.95654.1633583281051%40mail.yahoo.com.
