Just clarifications. On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 2:15:48 AM UTC+3 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
> But the purpose of randomizing the polarizer settings using photon from > sources on opposite sides of the universe is to prevent anyone from knowing > both settings before a measurement. > The point of THIS example is to investigate the issue of non-locality of splits in a MWI; not to test the Bell inequalities. Surely, if we aim for the latter, we will randomise the polariser settings. I'm not sure I see any function for your superobserver anyway. Are you > sure you need him? > Just as in Schroedinger's famous example with the cat, you need a "box" and an observer outside, in order to make sense of the cat being in an entangled superposition. Instead of a superobserver, we can do with an impersonal quantum description (in any chosen frame of reference), if you prefer. I hope that these inadequacies in my exposition will not prevent you from focusing on the "Conclusion" about the locality of splits! George K. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/590cfb5d-0196-49fa-b1a0-d9fed549d81cn%40googlegroups.com.
