On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 10:24:51 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 12:08 PM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >* you claim, without argument, that all possible outcomes are realized.* >> > > I don't need to make an argument for that because the one and only > assumption that Many Worlds makes, perhaps "axiom" would be a better word, > is that Schrödinger's Equation means what it says. > But S's equation just gives the time dependent probabilities BEFORE a measurement is taken. You've added an additional postulate without any justification. AG > If you want to claim that all outcomes allowed by Schrödinger are *NOT* > realized then you would have to introduce another axiom (a.k.a. assumption) > that restricts that number. But I remind you that Arkham's razor says the > simplest theory that explains observations is the one to be preferred. > > > John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis > <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> > ems > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2b91bebb-1bc0-4c85-a0ab-f0b972070f54n%40googlegroups.com.
