On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:12 AM Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 12:34:34 PM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 2:18 PM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> *I get it. No problem with those bridges. After all, Sean Carroll
>>> endorses it and he's on the facuty of Caltech! AG *
>> Well I don't get it, I have no idea what you're talking about.
> Maybe because you're mentally retarded? You posted Sean's "explanation"
> for where the energy comes from to create the world's which infatuate you!
> If a world has 1% probability of existing according to Born's rule, it has
> 1% of the original total energy! This is pure genius, from Caltech! He must
> have gotten this from the SE, right? AG

Yes, the idea is complete nuts. If I want to check energy conservation in
neutron decay, I compare the mass-energy of the original neutron to the sum
of the mass-energies of the decay products plus any kinetic energy of these
decay products. I want to do this for a decay in a time period where the
probability of decay is 1%. According to the division of energy according
to the Born probabilities, my check of energy conservation will fail: I
find that the decay products have only 1% of the initial energy. So, far
from protecting energy conservation in the MWI splitting process, all that
has been achieved is a demonstration that energy is never conserved in any
quantum process. As stated, this is nuts!


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to