On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:49 PM Bruce Kellett <bhkellet...@gmail.com> wrote:
*> Collapse, after all, has a perfectly reasonable mechanism in terms of > the flashes of relativistic GRW theory.* After the big brouhaha we had about energy conservation and how you thought it should be considered a sacred principle, it seems odd you would bring up GRW theory as an alternative to many worlds since the modification to Schrodinger's equation GRW requires violates the law of conservation of energy. And it violates the law of conservation of momentum. And it causes Schrodinger to be nondeterministic. And it makes solving the Schrodinger equation, which was already quite difficult, even more difficult. And there is not a shred of experimental evidence that it's actually true. And all these painful contortions were performed for one reason and one reason only, to get rid of those nasty many worlds that some people find emotionally distasteful. I say junk all those ridiculous bells and whistles and strip quantum mechanics down to its essentials. Energy Non-Conservation in Quantum Mechanics <https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.11052.pdf> John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> oxc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0SHBpB_5yOGjdV7vHKtRaP8DLK%2BkH%3DtuC18DbuRHnOaw%40mail.gmail.com.
