Spud is the culprit doing this. If he wants to go off-topic, he should start a dedicated thread, not wreak this one. AG
On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 5:51:30 PM UTC-7 Lawrence Crowell wrote: > On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 12:10:51 PM UTC-6 [email protected] > wrote: > >> Ah, and Minkowski's higher dimension appears to require Willem DeSitter >> to step in and re-normalize the view from such an observer. My thinking is, >> would this be some sort of tachyonic field in some kind of Lorentzian >> Manifold? You may know, but I cannot. >> >> > This discussion is splintering off into a range of utterly unconnected > topic, from de Sitter spacetime to Hogarth-Malamet hypercomputation. This > is completely disconnected, and it is delving far more into science fiction > than science. > > LC > > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> >> To: Everything List <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thu, Nov 17, 2022 6:57 am >> Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of >> reference? TY. >> >> What I outline is the idea of the Rindler wedge, or the spacetime >> according to an accelerated observer. The Unruh effect is a quantum field >> theoretic result on how quantum fields on either side of the induced >> particle horizon have no complete description according to the accelerated >> observer. As a result the Minkowski vacuum becomes vacuum plus a thermal >> distribution of bosons. >> >> LC >> >> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 8:41:49 PM UTC-6 [email protected] >> wrote: >> >> Acceleration at the speed of (G)ravity is a bit unconfirmed, though >> widely, accepted by the physics community to be the same as that of photons >> through an absolute vacuum. Meanwhile, we can also address through >> relativity this question: What is the aggregate speed of T = time? At a >> cosmological black hole time stops. At just under the speed of a photon in >> absolute vacuum ,the speed of time also enters a null set at the observer >> pov. >> >> It is also possible through the miracle or quantum gravity that the >> observer moment splits into many histories (Hawking-Hartle). >> Thus, the Reference Frame is made flesh through Everett-DeWitt-Wheeler >> equations, as MWI flourishes, via frame dragging. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> >> To: Everything List <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed, Nov 16, 2022 9:10 pm >> Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of >> reference? TY. >> >> Coordinate time variables dt = cosh(gs)ds and dx= sinh(gs)ds are such >> that dt^2 - dx^2 = (cosh^2(gs) - sinh^2(gs))ds^2 = ds^2, and defines a >> flat space metric for special relativity. These coordinates define an >> accelerated frame with acceleration g. >> >> LC >> >> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:14:26 PM UTC-6 [email protected] >> wrote: >> >> Can Ref Frames be addressed with General Relativity, also? Travel very >> fast, time slows down. Travel to a supermassive location, time slows down. >> The thing then is time, which Julian Barbour says it doesn't exist-which I >> understand. What exists is motion. Even motion at a quantum scale, like the >> bopping of electrons and photons. They move nonetheless, somebody in Italy, >> once said. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> >> To: Everything List <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed, Nov 16, 2022 7:05 pm >> Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of >> reference? TY. >> >> Accelerated frames can be addressed with special relativity. >> >> LC >> >> On Monday, November 14, 2022 at 2:14:46 PM UTC-6 [email protected] >> wrote: >> >> EOM. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5fb9eca5-7bea-4fe9-bfce-72c81d3341a1n%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5fb9eca5-7bea-4fe9-bfce-72c81d3341a1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> >> . >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/704be6ad-b69e-496b-ba24-f1bb282cc688n%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/704be6ad-b69e-496b-ba24-f1bb282cc688n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b52714e6-f6e4-4275-afae-3910219f3b6an%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b52714e6-f6e4-4275-afae-3910219f3b6an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6452b74d-043f-4746-a96b-77383ce6210dn%40googlegroups.com.
