On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 12:10:51 PM UTC-6 spudb...@aol.com wrote:

> Ah, and Minkowski's higher dimension appears to require Willem DeSitter to 
> step in and re-normalize the view from such an observer. My thinking is, 
> would this be some sort of tachyonic field in some kind of Lorentzian 
> Manifold? You may know, but I cannot. 
>
>
This discussion is splintering off into a range of utterly unconnected 
topic, from de Sitter spacetime to Hogarth-Malamet hypercomputation. This 
is completely disconnected, and it is delving far more into science fiction 
than science.

LC
 

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com>
> To: Everything List <everyth...@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Thu, Nov 17, 2022 6:57 am
> Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of 
> reference? TY.
>
> What I outline is the idea of the Rindler wedge, or the spacetime 
> according to an accelerated observer. The Unruh effect is a quantum field 
> theoretic result on how quantum fields on either side of the induced 
> particle horizon have no complete description according to the accelerated 
> observer. As a result the Minkowski vacuum becomes vacuum plus a thermal 
> distribution of bosons. 
>
> LC
>
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 8:41:49 PM UTC-6 spudb...@aol.com 
> wrote:
>
> Acceleration at the speed of (G)ravity is a bit unconfirmed, though 
> widely, accepted by the physics community to be the same as that of photons 
> through an absolute vacuum. Meanwhile, we can also address through 
> relativity this question: What is the aggregate speed of T = time? At a 
> cosmological black hole time stops. At just under the speed of a photon in 
> absolute vacuum ,the speed of time also enters a null set at the observer 
> pov.  
>
> It is also possible through the miracle or quantum gravity that the 
> observer moment splits into many histories (Hawking-Hartle). 
> Thus, the Reference Frame is made flesh through Everett-DeWitt-Wheeler 
> equations, as MWI flourishes, via frame dragging. 
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com>
> To: Everything List <everyth...@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Wed, Nov 16, 2022 9:10 pm
> Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of 
> reference? TY.
>
> Coordinate time variables dt = cosh(gs)ds and dx= sinh(gs)ds are such that 
> dt^2 - dx^2 =  (cosh^2(gs) - sinh^2(gs))ds^2 = ds^2, and defines a flat 
> space metric for special relativity. These coordinates define an 
> accelerated frame with acceleration g. 
>
> LC
>
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:14:26 PM UTC-6 spudb...@aol.com 
> wrote:
>
> Can Ref Frames be addressed with General Relativity, also? Travel very 
> fast, time slows down. Travel to a supermassive location, time slows down. 
> The thing then is time, which Julian Barbour says it doesn't exist-which I 
> understand. What exists is motion. Even motion at a quantum scale, like the 
> bopping of electrons and photons. They move nonetheless, somebody in Italy, 
> once said. 
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com>
> To: Everything List <everyth...@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Wed, Nov 16, 2022 7:05 pm
> Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of 
> reference? TY.
>
> Accelerated frames can be addressed with special relativity. 
>
> LC
>
> On Monday, November 14, 2022 at 2:14:46 PM UTC-6 agrays...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
> EOM.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5fb9eca5-7bea-4fe9-bfce-72c81d3341a1n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5fb9eca5-7bea-4fe9-bfce-72c81d3341a1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>  
> .
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/704be6ad-b69e-496b-ba24-f1bb282cc688n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/704be6ad-b69e-496b-ba24-f1bb282cc688n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b52714e6-f6e4-4275-afae-3910219f3b6an%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b52714e6-f6e4-4275-afae-3910219f3b6an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f38a0fa7-5e36-4a36-8b4d-4a861a4ab347n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to