What I outline is the idea of the Rindler wedge, or the spacetime according to an accelerated observer. The Unruh effect is a quantum field theoretic result on how quantum fields on either side of the induced particle horizon have no complete description according to the accelerated observer. As a result the Minkowski vacuum becomes vacuum plus a thermal distribution of bosons.
LC On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 8:41:49 PM UTC-6 [email protected] wrote: > Acceleration at the speed of (G)ravity is a bit unconfirmed, though > widely, accepted by the physics community to be the same as that of photons > through an absolute vacuum. Meanwhile, we can also address through > relativity this question: What is the aggregate speed of T = time? At a > cosmological black hole time stops. At just under the speed of a photon in > absolute vacuum ,the speed of time also enters a null set at the observer > pov. > > It is also possible through the miracle or quantum gravity that the > observer moment splits into many histories (Hawking-Hartle). > Thus, the Reference Frame is made flesh through Everett-DeWitt-Wheeler > equations, as MWI flourishes, via frame dragging. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> > To: Everything List <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, Nov 16, 2022 9:10 pm > Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of > reference? TY. > > Coordinate time variables dt = cosh(gs)ds and dx= sinh(gs)ds are such that > dt^2 - dx^2 = (cosh^2(gs) - sinh^2(gs))ds^2 = ds^2, and defines a flat > space metric for special relativity. These coordinates define an > accelerated frame with acceleration g. > > LC > > On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 6:14:26 PM UTC-6 [email protected] > wrote: > > Can Ref Frames be addressed with General Relativity, also? Travel very > fast, time slows down. Travel to a supermassive location, time slows down. > The thing then is time, which Julian Barbour says it doesn't exist-which I > understand. What exists is motion. Even motion at a quantum scale, like the > bopping of electrons and photons. They move nonetheless, somebody in Italy, > once said. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> > To: Everything List <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, Nov 16, 2022 7:05 pm > Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of > reference? TY. > > Accelerated frames can be addressed with special relativity. > > LC > > On Monday, November 14, 2022 at 2:14:46 PM UTC-6 [email protected] > wrote: > > EOM. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5fb9eca5-7bea-4fe9-bfce-72c81d3341a1n%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5fb9eca5-7bea-4fe9-bfce-72c81d3341a1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/704be6ad-b69e-496b-ba24-f1bb282cc688n%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/704be6ad-b69e-496b-ba24-f1bb282cc688n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b52714e6-f6e4-4275-afae-3910219f3b6an%40googlegroups.com.
