On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 4:25 AM Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.net> wrote:
>* Are you worried that some of us are not being sufficiently obsequious?* > No, I'm not worried about that because fortunately GPT-4 has not been behaving like the biblical Yahweh, I have seen no evidence that GPT-4 demands, or even would enjoy, constant flattery by humans. All I want is for you to look at this video and then do the rational thing and retract your claim that GPT-4 is "*not even close*" to human intelligence. GPT-4 solving hard riddles <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoyqRiGL4pg> *> I don't understand your preocupation John.* > You don't?! Can you think of anything more important to be preoccupied with? Can you think of anything that has happened in the world in your lifetime that was more significant than passing the Turing Test with flying colors? I can't. *> If GPT-4 is indeed close to human intelligence, this will become > undeniable in the next few weeks.* > It's been undeniable to all rational observers since last Tuesday, but you denied it. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> aro -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2hShe_6cp14_VS%2Bp6Nx6xATi6RB2n1Yu2U3u2V7eP4jA%40mail.gmail.com.
