On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 1:22 PM Jesse Mazer <laserma...@gmail.com> wrote:

*> Depends what you mean by "couldn't be true"--my understanding is that
> Einstein's EPR paper was just asserting that there must be additional
> elements of reality beyond the quantum description*

Yes, Einstein thought he had proven that quantum mechanics* must *be
incomplete because nature just couldn't be that ridiculous. But it turned
out nature *could* be that ridiculous. The moral of the story is that being
ridiculous is not necessarily the same thing as being wrong.

 John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to