" *the only way it could be infinite in spatial extent, would be for it to be either UN-created, or if it had a beginning it must have expanded instantaneously to infinity in spatial extent."

*First, this asserts a false premise.  It implies that un-created=no-beginning; or in the positive beginning=>created. Which any atheist will tell you doesn't follow.  Second, that beginning=>expansion from something (finite?) to infinite spatial extent.  This is false.   The universe could have a beginning in time at which it was infinite in spacial extent.  In fact that is most common current theory.

Brent

On 10/3/2024 6:34 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 7:02:26 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:

    The universe is spatially flat and it always has been and it's
    infinite spatially and always has been.  It had an earliest state
    we know about that was very dense and hot and things have expanded
    from that state.

    Brent


*It would be desirable and intellectually honest if, instead of preaching the Gospel  (the consensus view among cosmologists who can't think clearly),  you could argue against my logic. Too much to ask? AG*




    On 10/3/2024 8:59 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 9:50:12 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:

        You can only ever observe yourself. So by unobservable you
        mean the minds of other consciousnesses ?


    I'm seeking substantive responses, so please refrain from posting
    on this thread. AG


        On Thursday 3 October 2024 at 17:21:28 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:

            To recapitulate and clarify the argument:

            Firstly, by "universe" (our "bubble"), I mean the
            observable *and* unobservable regions defining our
            expanding universe.

            Secondly, since our universe is expanding, we could run
            the clock backward to any earlier time, and imagine
            enclosing it in a sphere, say, establishing that the
            observable region is finite in spatial extent. (It's
            actually measured to have a radius of 46 BLY.)

            Thirdly, concerning the *un*observable region, let's
            assume it's infinite in spatial extent. If so, this
            couldn't have occurred in stages, say by spatial
            expansion, since no matter how fast it might expand, or
            for how long a length of time, it would remain finite
            throughout, and could never achieve infinite status.
            Hence, the only way it could be infinite in spatial
            extent, would be for it to be either *UN*-*created*, or
            if it had a beginning it must have expanded
            *instantaneously* to infinity in spatial extent. These
            options are falsified in two ways; first by the CMBR,
            which is predicted by the Big Bang. That is, empirical
            evidence affirms it had a starting time. And second, as
            previously argued, if it is now infinite in spatial
            extent and had a beginning, it would have had to expand
            *instantaneously* to infinity. Since I consider this
            physically impossible -- which is my unproven and likely
            unprovable assumption -- by two lines of argument our
            universe must be finite in spatial extent.

            Final conclusions:, being *finite* in spatial extent, *it
            cannot be flat* (despite the consensus view), since that
            implies infinite in spatial extent (assuming it's not
            toroidal). And there is no need to do any measurements.
            Using a purely logical argument, our universe is finite
            in spatial extent and cannot have a flat global geometry.
            Its likely global geometry is approximately spherical,
            since it's expanding in all directions from every point
            in spacetime and is approximately isotropic. What could
            be *uncreated and infinite in space and time*, is the
            substratum from which our universe emerged.

            QED, AG

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/66ab8acd-3a49-4f69-9817-24fad7eb64afn%40googlegroups.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/66ab8acd-3a49-4f69-9817-24fad7eb64afn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7503c194-b042-4ebd-a817-8619b11bcad9n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7503c194-b042-4ebd-a817-8619b11bcad9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c7e79c42-3779-46d3-86ff-7a65499bbda5%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to