On 10/4/2024 6:44 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Friday, October 4, 2024 at 2:27:00 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:

    " *the only way it could be infinite in spatial extent, would be
    for it to be either UN-created, or if it had a beginning it must
    have expanded instantaneously to infinity in spatial extent."

    *
    First, this asserts a false premise.  It implies that
    un-created=no-beginning; or in the positive beginning=>created. 
    Which any atheist will tell you doesn't follow.  Second, that
    beginning=>expansion from something (finite?) to infinite spatial
    extent.  This is false.   The universe could have a beginning in
    time at which it was infinite in spacial extent.  In fact that is
    most common current theory.

    Brent


* I have no idea what you're claiming, such as un-created = no-beginning is false. *
*I'm not claiming it.  It's what you wrote.  It's just a paraphrase of what I quoted above because you convoluted expression made it hard to follow.  If my paraphrase is wrong, you're invited to clarify it yourself.


*
*You must have made it up, and now claim it's Gospel. If the universe is UN-created and exists, it's Eternal, meaning No Beginning. AG*
*See you reiterated the same thing, which is a false inference. The universe may have come into being without being created. Created implies some prior existing agent to do the creating.

Uncreated and eternal and no beginning are three different adjutives.  Uncreated is just the negation of created (see above).  Eternal means lasting for all time.  The universe may last infinitely long into the future, but not be past enternal. No beginning means past eternal.

If you expect anymore answers you need to write questions which don't need a paragraph of parsing.

Brent
*



    On 10/3/2024 6:34 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 7:02:26 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:

        The universe is spatially flat and it always has been and
        it's infinite spatially and always has been.  It had an
        earliest state we know about that was very dense and hot and
        things have expanded from that state.

        Brent


    *It would be desirable and intellectually honest if, instead of
    preaching the Gospel  (the consensus view among cosmologists who
    can't think clearly), you could argue against my logic. Too much
    to ask? AG*




        On 10/3/2024 8:59 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


        On Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 9:50:12 AM UTC-6 Cosmin
        Visan wrote:

            You can only ever observe yourself. So by unobservable
            you mean the minds of other consciousnesses ?


        I'm seeking substantive responses, so please refrain from
        posting on this thread. AG


            On Thursday 3 October 2024 at 17:21:28 UTC+3 Alan
            Grayson wrote:

                To recapitulate and clarify the argument:

                Firstly, by "universe" (our "bubble"), I mean the
                observable *and* unobservable regions defining our
                expanding universe.

                Secondly, since our universe is expanding, we could
                run the clock backward to any earlier time, and
                imagine enclosing it in a sphere, say, establishing
                that the observable region is finite in spatial
                extent. (It's actually measured to have a radius of
                46 BLY.)

                Thirdly, concerning the *un*observable region, let's
                assume it's infinite in spatial extent. If so, this
                couldn't have occurred in stages, say by spatial
                expansion, since no matter how fast it might expand,
                or for how long a length of time, it would remain
                finite throughout, and could never achieve infinite
                status. Hence, the only way it could be infinite in
                spatial extent, would be for it to be either
                *UN*-*created*, or if it had a beginning it must
                have expanded *instantaneously* to infinity in
                spatial extent. These options are falsified in two
                ways; first by the CMBR, which is predicted by the
                Big Bang. That is, empirical evidence affirms it had
                a starting time. And second, as previously argued,
                if it is now infinite in spatial extent and had a
                beginning, it would have had to expand
                *instantaneously* to infinity. Since I consider this
                physically impossible -- which is my unproven and
                likely unprovable assumption -- by two lines of
                argument our universe must be finite in spatial extent.

                Final conclusions:, being *finite* in spatial
                extent, *it cannot be flat* (despite the consensus
                view), since that implies infinite in spatial extent
                (assuming it's not toroidal). And there is no need
                to do any measurements. Using a purely logical
                argument, our universe is finite in spatial extent
                and cannot have a flat global geometry. Its likely
                global geometry is approximately spherical, since
                it's expanding in all directions from every point in
                spacetime and is approximately isotropic. What could
                be *uncreated and infinite in space and time*, is
                the substratum from which our universe emerged.

                QED, AG

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "Everything List" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
        from it, send an email to [email protected].
        To view this discussion on the web visit
        
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/66ab8acd-3a49-4f69-9817-24fad7eb64afn%40googlegroups.com
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/66ab8acd-3a49-4f69-9817-24fad7eb64afn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7503c194-b042-4ebd-a817-8619b11bcad9n%40googlegroups.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7503c194-b042-4ebd-a817-8619b11bcad9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6bf62d6f-3c71-4e1d-bfd8-20cd967da226n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6bf62d6f-3c71-4e1d-bfd8-20cd967da226n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/32b51077-cbf4-4214-88e8-c826fd683042%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to