@Alan. How do you think God gets to live all the possible lives at the same 
time if not being in superposition of all these lives ?

On Tuesday 8 October 2024 at 21:27:19 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:

> On Tuesday, October 8, 2024 at 10:30:43 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 10:12 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> *> It could mean the system is in one of the states of the superposition, 
> but we don't know which one;*
>
>
> *Yes, it could be that the electron was in one and only one state before 
> the measurement was made and we just don't know which one. If  that is the 
> case then realism is correct and, to be consistent with experimental 
> results, either determinism or locality or both must be wrong.  You just 
> can't have realism and localityand determinism, you've got to abandon at 
> least one of those three things.*
>
>
> *Could you explain why this is the case, if it is? TY, AG *
>
>
> * >OR, as in the Stern-Gerlach experiment, it's not in any of the states 
> of the superposition before measurement!*
>
>
> *Yes It could be that it was not in any one particular state before a 
> measurement in which case realism would be wrong, or it could be that it 
> was in all possible states before a measurement in which case realism is 
> also wrong.  For realism to be correct it would have to be in one and only 
> one definite state before a measurement was made.*
>
>
> *In SG. the electron is an undetermined state before the measurement, and 
> the measurement might force it into UP or DN spin, or reveal its state 
> before measurement. We just don't know, and more important IMO, we can't 
> know. All we can do is measure and acknowledge the result. This is what 
> Schrodinger established with his cat experiment, EXCEPT that he went 
> further -- in establishing we know the state before opening the box is not 
> alive and dead simultaneously while the box is closed. So, in general, it's 
> impossible to say anything about a superposition EXCEPT that we know 
> nothing about the state of the system before measuring it. So, there's 
> really no possible test for realism or its denial. In the case of MW, 
> you're assuming a great deal about a system's state before measurement, but 
> you (and the other "experts" you've referenced) have no logical basis for 
> that assumption. AG*
>
>
>  > *he's referring to results of Bell experiments, which ostensibly deny 
> realism.*
>
>
> *The falsification of Bell's Inequality does not mean realism must be 
> wrong, it means that realism might be wrong, and if it's right then 
> determinism or locality or both must be wrong.  *
>
>
> *But, as I stated above, IMO we can't know if realism is false. I thought 
> Bell experiments falsified realism, but you say otherwise. Now I am not 
> sure if you are correct, but you might be. AG *
>
>  
>
> *> Copenhagen doesn't explain the collapse of the wf as a dynamical event. 
> I view it as a bookkeeping device*
>
>
> *Yes, and some people, perhaps even most people, don't even try to explain 
> the ambiguities in Quantum Mechanics and are content with the "Shut Up And 
> Calculate" philosophy** (a.k.a. the Copenhagen interpretation) ;** and 
> that's fine if you're an engineer and are only interested in making sure 
> you get the right reading on your voltmeter. Personally I'd like a little 
> more but there is no disputing matters of taste. * 
>
>
> *I do not embrace that philosophy. Definitely not. I think we should keep 
> thinking about the problem, and perhaps, some day, a solution will be 
> found. But since that day isn't today, it's foolish for those who assume 
> the solution has been found - namely, that superposition implies a system 
> is in all states simultaneously before the measurement -- to go off 
> assuming MW or whatever, based on a presently, and possibly undecidable 
> proposition. AG *
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8a069ea7-2bf4-4d9f-b5c4-aa4d6feb7e20n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to