On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 9:40 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
*>>> Why do you characterize the explanation of the possible insufficiency > of our concept of space, a NON-local hidden variable?* > > > *>> Because if an event occurred 4 light years away and happened LESS than > 4 years ago and yet it still affected you then that affect was non-local, > because that's what "non-local" means. Is such an affect possible, does > Quantum Mechanics permit it? Nobody knows, but if I were betting I would > bet not.* > > > *> Your first sentence requires IMO, more precision. Please re-write it.* > *No.* > >Are you referring to faster-than-SoL phenomenom? > Obviously. *John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* v0o > > q > > > *> Two observers can't send information to each other because neither > knows what will come up in a coin flip if the outcome is modeled quantum > mechanically, that is irreducibly random , but each element of a pair of > entangled particles can send information to its partner** [faster than > light] * > > > *Maybe. If somebody can prove that is true then we will know that Quantum > Mechanics is non-local, and the violation of Bell's Inequality does not > rule out non-local hidden variables, it only rules out local hidden > variables. * > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0cRTeb4hob2wnzS%2BNt79BJpTmmuxYrPSQ7UHqCHx52mw%40mail.gmail.com.
