On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:57 PM Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bruce,
>
> You argue that MWI predicts a uniform distribution of outcomes because all
> sequences exist and each branch contains exactly one observer. Since
> experiments follow the Born rule instead, you claim MWI is falsified. But
> this assumes that measure has no effect—something you have not proven.
>
> The fact that 2^N sequences exist does not mean they all contribute
> equally to an observer’s experience. That’s the core issue. If measure
> determines how many copies of an observer exist in different branches, then
> high-measure branches dominate experience. This would naturally lead to
> Born-rule frequencies, without contradicting experiment.
>
> Simply stating that each branch contains "one observer" and that measure
> is irrelevant does not prove MWI is falsified—it assumes your conclusion.
> If you want to show MWI is incompatible with experiment, you need more than
> just claiming that measure plays no role; you need to justify why quantum
> experiments consistently match despite your assertion that all sequences
> should be equally likely.
>

The fact is that you get the same 2^N binary sequences from the binary
state |psi> = a|0> + b|1> whatever the values of a and b. My case is proven.

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQGGNQZnr8JkO5h8fGVAETWsk2fheYpH8ruSr8N7GNXhQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to