On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 9:00 AM Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bruce, you keep insisting that unitary QM provides no mechanism for > measure affecting observer distribution, but you haven't actually proven > this—only asserted it. > You have not proven the contrary. It is all merely assertion on your part. If you are so convinced that unitary evolution can produce the structures you envisage, then derive those structures with the context of unitary QM. Show the mathematics! All that is required to prove my point is to observer that the 2^N binary sequences that result from repeated measurements of the simple binary state a|0> + b|1> do not depend on the amplitudes a and b. If you dispute this, show how the binary sequences do depend on the amplitudes. Don't just assert it. What different set of sequences do I get with differing values of a and b? Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSYsR4YTRH2qaGPZcBNKQ58LkUfkyY5yaNS4HuEKseLLg%40mail.gmail.com.
