On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:33 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:07 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > > > > This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot > > > > > release. Anyways is fine IMO. > > > > > > > > Hi Srini, > > > > > > > > I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest revision of > > > > Subversion trunk still has the version in configure.in at 3.15.92 and > > > > the latest ChangeLog entry is: > > > > > > > > 2007-09-03 Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > ** GtkHTML 3.15.92 release > > > > > > > > * NEWS, configure.in: > > > > > > > > But the latest ChangeLog entry in the 3.16.0 tarball is: > > > > > > > > 2007-09-17 Srinivasa Ragavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > ** GtkHTML 3.16.0 release > > > > > > > > * NEWS: > > > > * configure.in: > > > > > > > > So it looks like at least the ChangeLog, NEWS, and configure.in changes > > > > prior to the 3.16.0 tarball upload were never committed. > > > > > > Which, BTW, is still the case for evolution (version 2.11.92 in svn) and > > > e-d-s (version 1.11.92 in svn). The changes up to and including x.12.0 > > > must still be on someones disk. > > > > It is there in gnome-2-20 branch as well. It isn't there in trunk. > > So the gnome-2-20 branch is further along than trunk? Not exactly. Just that it wasn't committed here and now it is just there.
-Srini. > _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers