On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 09:27 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 10:49 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: > > Am Montag 12 September 2011, um 09:57:26 schrieb Milan Crha: > > > I wouldn't do that, as it doubles work for translators, because it's > > > their time now. Does it make that large difference to "wait" for next > > > two weeks? You can always do those things locally and branch&commit > > > later anyway. > > > Regarding the current plannings for porting evolution-kolab to a current > > dev > > version of Evo/E-D-S, it could prove very helpful to have this > > infrastructure > > available for basing our work on. We'd appreciate it much if the merge > > could > > be done as soon as the translator's window is closed and the merge can be > > done > > without foreseeable extra work for the release currently under preparation. > > Very well, we'll branch then when the hard code freeze begins as we > usually do. The code freeze begins next Monday (September 19) after > 2.91.92 tarballs are released.
Hi, it's 3.1.92, but anyway, it's hard-code freeze and still time for translators. I never much liked the "early" branching, as I know how pity it is to commit one change twice. Would it really make that big difference to wait one more week (it's those two, as I mentioned in my first mail here)? Bye, Milan _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers