Still seems like an odd problem to me.  Not quite sure why it keeps
forcing Rich Text.

Here's something else to try.  In your Global Settings in Internet
Message Formats, add your Lotus Notes domain address.  From there try
setting the Message Format and set under Advanced to "Never use"
Exchange rich-text format.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Blunt
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 6:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Sending to a Lotus Notes system

Ok...since no one but James responded, I'll assume my assumptions in
the first e-mail were correct.

So now, I'm faced with this dilemma.

I have nine (9) mail-enabled contacts for this governmental
organization, whose accounts reside on Lotus Notes servers located
back East.  All nine contacts have three email addresses:
          [EMAIL PROTECTED] (default SMTP address)
          [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lotus Notes address I added
later)
...and an X400 e-mail address created by default

Currently, I have got everything working, without any modifications on
the user side, as long as they 1) clear the Outlook cache before
sending and 2) type the entire Lotus Notes address instead of picking
it from the GAL.

If they pick the person from the GAL, it uses the SMTP address and
fails...it attaches a winmail.dat file.

If I change the SMTP address to match the Lotus Notes address...same
thing.

If I leave the new SMTP address and delete the Lotus Notes
address...same thing.

If I go to the Exchange General tab of the mail-enabled contact and
change the home e-mail address (not to be confused with the default
SMTP address) to a Lotus Notes address, I get the following error
message when I pick the person from the GAL:

"The message could not be delivered because the recipient's
destination email system is unknown or invalid. Please check the
address and try again, or contact your system administrator to verify
connectivity to the email system of the recipient.
            <server.domain.com #5.1.2>"

Is there ANY way to get the Lotus Notes e-mail address to be the
DEFAULT e-mail address that is used, when picking one of these
individuals from the GAL?

TIA,

Jim


On 5/7/07, Jim Blunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James,
>
> No...that option was not enabled.
>
> Jim
>
> On 5/4/07, Knoch Jr., James W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You did not have "Use MAPI rich text format" enabled in Exchange
> > Advanced on those Contacts did you?  By default it is not selected,
so
> > when you created those Mail-enabled accounts it set them to not have
> > this checked.  That check box would override whatever the client
sent as
> > to be sent as Rich Text.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jim
> > Blunt
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:03 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Sending to a Lotus Notes system
> >
> > Scenario:
> >      - Sending Server:  Exchange 2003 Native, SP1 on Windows 2003,
SP1
> >      - Sending Client:  Outlook 2003, SP1 and Outlook 2003, SP2
> >      - Sending Domain:  Windows 2003 AD, Native mode
> >      - Receiving Server:  Lotus Notes Domino server, version 6.5.2
> >      - Receiving Client:  ?
> >
> > Issue:
> > We are required to send e-mail to a certain governmental oversight
> > organization, as part of our contract.  This organization is a
> > completely seperate entity from us and utilizes Lotus Notes.  They
> > have nine (9) people from their organization in our GAL, as
> > mail-enabled contacts.  Those mail-enabled contacts had an SMTP
> > address defined as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
> >
> > However when we sent them anything from Outlook, regardless of what
> > format we sent it in (plain text, RTF, HTML), it would always remove
> > the formatting and put the formatting and any attachment in a
> > winmail.dat file.  The only time this didn't happen, was if a
> > non-Microsoft attachment was sent (Adobe pdf), attached to a
> > plain-text e-mail.  If the same formatted e-mail was sent from an
> > Exchange 2003 OWA interface with a MS attachment, formatting and
> > attachment were received intact.  I'm *ASSUMING* this is because the
> > HTML nature of the OWA interface doesn't attach the Microsoft
Outlook
> > Rich Text formatting to the e-mail in the form of a TNEF attachment.
> > Is my understanding correct?
> >
> > Since this involved Director-level personnel however, using the OWA
to
> > send e-mails to this organization wasn't deemed an appropriate
> > long-term workaround.
> >
> > I tried everything I know of, to fix this.   I tried:
> >      1.  Sending in HTML, Plain-text and RTF default e-mail formats,
> > all with and without attachments and formatting.
> >      2.  I went into the Tools/Options/Mail Format tab of Outlook,
> > clicked on the Internet options and tried every combination of
> > HTML/Outlook RTF/Plain-text, in tandem with the options in #1.
> >      3.  Along with options #1 & 2, I also tried
UUencoding...nothing
> > worked.
> >      4.  Adding a rule(?) on the Exchange server from the ESM under
> > Global Options/Internet Formats(?) that specified that anything
going
> > to "@name.gov" would be converted to plain-text, regardless of user
> > settings...still nothing.
> >
> > Solution:
> > Since Exchange is an SMTP format mail server, if you have more than
> > one type of e-mail address specified (notes, smtp, msmail, etc), I'm
> > *ASSUMING* it uses the SMTP by default.  So...I went in and defined
a
> > Lotus Notes address that was "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" for
each
> > of the nine mail-enabled contacts.  Then, I had the people from our
> > company sending to those individuals type in the Lotus Notes address
> > in the To: section (since I'm *ASSUMING* that if they just pick it
from
> > the GAL, it will us the SMTP address).  Once they did this, it
> > realized it was sending to a foreign mail system and must have
> > formatted the headers different, because this time, all the
formatting
> > came through intact in the initial e-mail and it didn't matter what
> > the attachment type was.
> >
> > So...are my assumptions that I made during this process correct, and
> > was there an easier way to fix this problem?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jim

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Reply via email to