At the risk of sounding stoopid (well, more stoopid) - this means that BCC'ing would 
solve his problem, yes?  Hotmail wouldn't reject the messages because they'd be 
individually delivered.  That's what I originally thought but my brain is working at 
around 40% capacity after this weekend and I didn't find anything solid when I did a 
quick search.

If this is true, then Hotmail's "anti-spam" measures would serve nothing except to 
increase server traffic for these messages by 80 times (if there were 80 hotmail 
recipients).

Eric

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:15:17 -0700, "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange recipient.  If a
> single message were sent to all recipients at a domain, then each would know
> about the others, defeating the purpose of BCC.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
> All your base are belong to us.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
> 
> 
> Sorry - I think I spoke too soon (it's a very lethargic and overcast Monday
> here in SD).  If more than 25 recipients were Hotmail addresses, BCC'ing
> wouldn't fix your problem since all the Hotmail addresses would still be
> sent using a single transmission.
> 
> I'm not that familiar with GFI yet - but I'm getting ready to prototype and
> implement a Ex2k / GFI system for a smaller client.  Have you considered
> trying to use GFI's content scanning mechanism to identify and re-address
> messages with large recipient lists?  Does anyone know if there's a hook
> like this available out of the box?  Just a thought.
> 
> Eric
> 
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:02:57 UT, "Exchange Discussions"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Can anyone in your org address the "All Students" DL?  If it's just for
> administrative staff you could try training them to address this list in the
> BCC: field so the address info would not be sent along with the message.
> >
> > I agree with another post on this topic - I think you've gone too far to
> try and make your solution flexible for the student's benefit.  Sometimes
> you need to draw the line - but as we all know (I've been reprimanded for
> arguing the point) sometimes technical justification and business
> justification standpoints just don't get along.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:41:47 -0500, "Exchange Discussions"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest
> build), Dell PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM.
> > >
> > > Dear Exchange Guru�s and Goddesses:
> > >
> > > Q:  Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per
> message for a specific remote domain?  More specifically, break a message
> with more than x number of recipients into multiple messages.  If so, how?
> > >
> > > Explanation:  This year, I allowed students to choose whether to use
> their own email address (mail enabled account) or an account on our system
> (mailbox enabled account).   All students, regardless of their choice of
> accounts, are added to the �All Students� group, allowing the staff to send
> announcements as necessary.  This works great except for one thing:
> messages sent to "All Students" always get an NDR with every Hotmail user
> listed.
> > >
> > > So, I ask Hotmail support why that might be happening and this is their
> reply:  "I understand how inconvenient it is on your part but I would like
> to inform you that we have only a limit of 25 recipients per messages."
> > >
> > > Great.  If you try to include more than 25 Hotmail recipients in a
> single message, Hotmail will reject the entire message.  So, I need a way to
> have Exchange break up the message into multiple messages with only 25
> recipients per each when addressed to a Hotmail address.  Any ideas?  Other
> solutions?
> > >
> > > My only idea at this time is to create several "Hotmail Users #x" type
> groups, and then assign up to 25 Hotmail users per group to each of these
> groups, and add these groups to the All Students group.  This is way more
> hands-on than I want to get on this; the rest of the process is completely
> automated.
> > >
> > > If I am to be FAQ'ed here, please point to a specific page.  I have
> searched the FAQ, Slipstick, groups.google.com, northernlight.com, etc. and
> have found nothing that relates to this problem.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Greg
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to