TMI TMI!!!!

--------------------------
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Denis Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:52 PM
Subject: RE: Computer Associates


> ahahaa... :)
>
> You can add this to you list. An exact quote from a friend of mine about a
> month ago...
>
> "InnoculateIt is to Trend Viruswall what a Pinto is to a Dodge Viper.
Sure,
> it has four wheels. So does my wife's dildo. It doesn't mean that I admit
to
> working with or using either."
>
> Denis
>
> Denis A. Baldwin
> Network Administrator, CAE. Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lefkovics,
> William
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Computer Associates
>
>
>
> CA contacted me, concerned about posts I've made regarding their products.
> In the past it has not been their policy to participate in these forums
> because vendors aren't always treated very well.  They are reconsidering
> this policy.
>
> William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP
>
> Here is the list of ACTUAL quotes I assembled for them in response to
their
> sudden concern (I did not include names, but these are from public
forums):
>
> When someone made a comment like this:
>
> -"We have bought Arcserve 2000 w/ the backup agent for Exchange to backup
> our Exchange Server and have been having nothing but problems." - Saul,
> October 10, 2001
>
> The ACTUAL replies were as follows:
>
> -"Do you really want us to go for the entire day about how HORRIBLE of a
> product Jerkserv is/???? NTBACK2k [1] is 1000 times better. Return the
> Jerkserv and install Backup Exec"
>
> -"The best thing to do with CA products, is to place them in the dumpster,
> where they belong."
>
> -"We have been using Arcserve 2000 for awhile now and I would have to say
> that it DOES SUCK."
>
> -"why do people buy that program? I have never heard anyone say anything
> nice about it?"
>
> -"Don't get started on that crappy as*s piece of software."
>
>
> Other comments about CA software, by those who actually use it:
>
> -"Let me clue you in on something.  I've got a good friend at
> CA - he told me that they have a bad time getting their E2K servers backed
> up
> using their product!!!!"
>
> -"ArcCrap is exactly that...  Unreliable, no support, a pain in the arse,
> breaks more than it fixes...  Shall I go on?"
>
> -"Arcserve does an excellent job of backup things up, it's
> downfall is the ability to restore things...."
>
> -"Arcserve and anything is not a good choice."
>
> -"I agree on Arcserve, which is the lowliest of backup products anyway."
>
> -"Arcserve and a dumpster are a perfect fit."
>
> -"There's only so much overtime one man can do, and my quota's
> fully taken by using AarghServe"
>
> -"Run away! Fast! Seriously. There are very few here who like working with
> ANY CA products even if they inherit them, much less ask for them."
>
> -"you can switch to arcserve if your current backup is too fast for you"
>
> -"Running Innoculan was somewhat akin to flogging myself."
>
> -"I've only purchased a few products from CA and the support was
> absolutely horrid. I have had other system administrators with the same
> experience. Most of the products themselves were very good until CA
> buys the company, then the support seems to go down the tubes."
>
> -"I can't seem to get ARCServe to back up my (WINNT 4.0 SP6) Exchange
server
> 5.5 SP2 data files."
>
> -"EjaculateIT has worked well for us as a desktop antivirus solution for
our
> office, but for the Exchange Agent, I'd recommend hiring a tibetan monk to
> analyse code segments manually for viral patterns than ever recommend this
> piece of crap clearly written by laid off AOL programmers."
>
> -"The last time I remember any kind of success with ArcServe was when
> Computer
> Associates didn't own it and it was running on Novell. Ever since Computer
> Associates got involved, it has become unreliable garbage."
>
> -"Yes, although usually alot of things tend to not work after a CA product
> is
> installed."
>
> -"When it comes time to update CA's stuff, maybe an alternative would be
in
> order
> here."
>
> -"in my short time in the IT industry InoculateIT 4.53 is the worst piece
of
> software I have had the displeasure
> to work with. Closely followed by Arcserve."
>
> -"I don't feel like playing with ArcServe**It right now."
>
> -"I just started a new job. they have this SQL server that is all hosed
> up. I uninstall JarkServ and it all worked better : > no more problems
> go figure."
>
> -"Don't use arcserve - its horrible."
>
> -"We cannot get a good IS backup using ArcServe2000..."
>
> -"Given the knowledge (or lack or it) exhibited by various CA
> techs, I trust them about as far as I can throw them."
>
> -"You hate ARCServe? Can't understand why. Don't you like being pummeled
by
> a brain-dead licensing and registration process that's just an extra added
> bit of torture?"
>
> -"when we moved to Exchange instead of Netscape Messaging Server, we
> discovered that Arcserve wasn't too friendly"
>
> -"If our damn Arcserve was working could have restored the whole box, but
it
> has been failing
> for a while."
>
> -"We use InocIT because the tech people aren't making enough of the buying
> decisions around here. I would choose anything but InocIT. Actually I
> would stay away from any CA product..."
>
> -"A search on ArcServe's tech support FAQs revealed nothing."
>
> -"licensing was the worst aspect of CAI products. Make that 2nd worst,
after
> tech support"
>
> -"ArcWreckIT will do exactly that..."
>
> -"Arcserve backups have been failing and I haven't got a backup."
>
> -"this InoculateIT software sucks!"
>
> -"I gave up using Arcserve 2000 - went back to using NTBackup, and then
onto
> Backup Exec."
>
> -"I hate ArcServe... I am holding my breath until we get the new servers
up
> and running -- and they won't be
> using ArcServe."
>
> -"I am a fully signed up member of the CA bashing bandwagon."
>
> -"We unfortunately still use InnoculateIT on the desktops.  Innoculate
> couldn't catch a virus if it were sprinkled with anthrax powder."
>
> -"Unfortunately, yes, I have tried the CA support site.  Spent 3
> hours going round in circles on it trying to find a decent answer!!"
>
> -"the answer would be, 'Anything but Arcserve.'"
>
> -"Federal law prohibits using the words "CA", "Exchange" and "scan" in the
> same sentence."
>
> -"...having nothing at all is better than having InnoculateIT because then
> you don't have a false sense of security?"
>
> -"It tells me the Database is corrupted.  THANK YOU COMPUTER ASSOCIATES!"
>
> -"It goes great with the Inoculan Antivirus and Log File
> Discombobulator system from Compooter Assoshiates."
>
> -"A similar thing happened to me when installing Computer Associate's
> Inoculate IT according to the installation instructions on their CD.  I do
> not recall exactly all the changes I made, but it had to do with
permissions
> and/or search privileges.  CA sent the "proper" installation instructions
> via email saying, "Oh yeah, the instructions on the CD are wrong".  It
still
> took several hours with PSS to get things back to normal....
> I don't know if this helps or if is just another anti-CA rant."
>
> -"We are trying to set up Arcserve 2000 to backup our Exchange 2000
server,
> we
> have bought the Exchange backup agent but are having a hell of a time
trying
> to set it up!!!!"
>
> -"ahem, I think that this just might be another quality CA experience."
>
> -"We bought ARCserve but it's just sitting here, unused and unloved."
>
>
> Still, I close with a Haiku discussion from an Exchange Discussions forum,
> which in its own way summarizes sentiment about your products :
>
> It's Five-Seven-Five
> Your first line was only four
> Go Punish yourself
>
> I screwed up haiku
> So must now punish myself
> Installing arcserv
>
> Installing Arcserve
> Is not enough punishment
> You must make it work.
>
> And backup alone
> Is not good enough either.
> You must restore too.
>
> And when you are done
> Please call CA and let them
> Know how you did it
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to