I'm running a clean burn of XP Pro SP2/Office XP SP1.

T.


-----Original Message-----
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly

For the record, I'm running W2K and OfficeXP, which was upgraded from
Office2000.

S.

-----Original Message-----
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly


I'm having the same problem both of you are.  I'm running WinXP SP2,
upgraded from W2k, with OfficeXP, upgraded from O2k...I'm sure it's a
"feature" of the upgrade process.

-----Original Message-----
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly


Well, you're right.  There is something weird going on.  When I grouped
by
conversation, it did separate on mine, even though I am also running XP.
BUT, I have upgraded from 2000 as opposed to a fresh install.  The other
thing is when you group by conversation you can't sort them.  The
sorting
doesn't work.  I tried sorting by conversation and/or subject and it's
still
not sorted alpabetically.

This is too weird.

S.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly


That's what I thought. I have my views configured the way you state
(always
have), but I'm still seeing weird sorting behavior. I'm seeing it on
multiple machines, so I know it's not isolated. I never saw this happen
with
prior versions.

It's probably a config problem.

Take a look at the thread titled "The Deleted Item Folder" and look for
the
message from Robert Moore with the subject line "Problem solved". In
prior
versions, that I believe that would have changed thread. I'm probably
mistaken, but tell me what you think.

T.

-----Original Message-----
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly

You just haven't had enough coffee.  The conversation header is separate
from subject line.  So, what you're seeing is by design.  It's been
there
all the time.  As a matter of fact, if you set it to group by
conversation
and sort by conversation index, you'll see that responses within a
thread
are indented based on the reply, just like a forum.

S.


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OL02 Views not presented correctly


Has anyone noticed that OL 2002 does some odd things with posts from
this
list when you have your view set to Group by Conversation?

 

I noticed that if you have your view set to Group by Conversation, and
someone replies to a post and changes the Subject line, the post will
still
show in the original Conversation. If you check the header, it's still
got
the original Thread-Topic in the header, so it keeps it in the original
conversation.

 

I don't remember ever seeing this behavior in prior versions. Though it
could be I've just not had enough coffee yet. :-)

 

Has anyone seen this behavior too? 

 

Tom.

 


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to