>Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees >From: Chris Scharff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:23:08 -0500 >X-Message-Number: 35 >.... >Per 4, it might explain why the acronym "DL" was such a foreign concept to >him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail is >hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must say I >was quite startled by its simplicity.
With respect, I must point out that technically, "DL" is not an acronym; rather it is simply two initials. An acronym is a word formed from initials. Otherwise, thanks for your voice of reason. I just recently explained a much better way of 'killing' those unwanted messages by way of a server based rule. As I mentioned making a DL forces Exchange to accept the messages as legitimate mail rather than bouncing them, as it should. Shawn ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer. Dipix Technologies Inc. ! _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
