Why's that Darcy? I'm assuming money-related? Or is your company being paranoid about sending their employees on planes again after Sept 11?
Jim Blunt "If a man advances confidently in the direction of his dreams and endeavors to live a life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unseen in common hours." ~Henry David Thoreau -----Original Message----- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Don't get me started on that right now. . . word just came down: no training that requires travel. In other words - no MEC. ARGGLLLLL!!!!! -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees There are certainly situations in which an inbox rule may be appropriate. I think Arch's original post in this thread mentioned something about them in fact. But for $vbc a rules wizard solution does have a few scalability issues. Not everyone is as big or wildly successful as Getty Images though. ;) > -----Original Message----- > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > Uh - Shawn. . . think again about your rule. Besides taking a bit more > effort to implement, your rule *still* requires the server to accept the > mail. > > And, no, as the admin you don't have to see all the nondeliverable stuff > if you don't want to. Go to your IMS and take a look at the options for > handling undeliverable mail. > > Go ahead and use your inbox-with-rules method, I'll stay with a sinkhole > DL. > > Darcy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:30 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > > > > >Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees > >From: Chris Scharff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:23:08 -0500 > >X-Message-Number: 35 > >.... > >Per 4, it might explain why the acronym "DL" was such a foreign concept > to > >him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail > is > >hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must say > I > >was quite startled by its simplicity. > > With respect, I must point out that technically, "DL" is not an acronym; > rather it is simply two initials. An acronym is a word formed from > initials. > > Otherwise, thanks for your voice of reason. > > I just recently explained a much better way of 'killing' those unwanted > messages by way of a server based rule. > As I mentioned making a DL forces Exchange to accept the messages as > legitimate mail rather than bouncing them, as it should. > > Shawn > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > --- > Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer. Dipix Technologies Inc. > ! > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ======================================================= > This email and its contents are confidential. If you > are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose > or use the information within this email or its > attachments. If you have received this email in error, > please delete it immediately. Thank you. > ======================================================= > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ======================================================= This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. ======================================================= _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
