Hi Darcy. Thanks for your answer.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Darcy Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:52 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > Pfooey! I have several stores that are well over 50gb each. No problems with cycling the store, rebooting the boxes, performing backups (and restores) etc. . . > > You just have to know WTF you're doing. > > Hey - didn't you once claim to be an expert in Exchange 5.5? > > Darcy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > Hello. > > I have been told that Exchange 5.5 with IS bigger than 50G is VERY bad. > It means there is big chance the IS won't start after restart..... > > I am wondering if this is true, meaning, this is an undocument limitation, > and should I be afraid to have IS above 70G? > The IS is on EMC. The server is very very strong and acts very fast.... > > Thanks for your time! > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:32 PM > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > SIS is maintained per database, not per server. So in moving users between > > databases SIS is maintained on a per database basis. When, how and where > you > > should opt for additional servers, databases or storage groups is not a > > universal formula which can be applied unilaterally. Based on the > > information you've provided there is no "right" answer. I know of > > organizations with significantly larger databases than 70GB, whether or > not > > that is appropriate for the organization you are working with is > impossible > > to say at this point. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:11 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > I think I am missing something. > > > > > > As far as I understand, if I install second exchange server > > > in the site, I will get a new priv.edb. If I move mailbox to > > > that server, I will loose SIS between servers. So, if a > > > message is sent to 4 mailbox's on one server, and 9 mailboxes > > > on second server, I will have 2 instance of the same message. > > > > > > Am I right? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Couch, Nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:55 PM > > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > > I vote for two servers. > > > > > > > > Nate Couch > > > > EDS Messaging > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > > > From: Great Cthulhu Jones > > > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > > Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two > > > servers. > > > > > If not, buy more hard drives. > > > > > > > > > > (:= > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti > > > > > Chakravarty (Senteq) > > > > > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi guys. > > > > > > > > > > I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB > > > > > (total > > > of > > > > > 500 users). > > > > > I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into > > > > > two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS....... > > > > > On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. > > > > > > > > > > I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I > > > would like to > > > hear > > > > > your opinions. > > > > > In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to > > > EMC box in 3 > > > > > months (part of storage project). > > > > > > > > > > I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such > > > big IS (are > > > > > there?!) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ======================================================= > This email and its contents are confidential. If you > are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose > or use the information within this email or its > attachments. If you have received this email in error, > please delete it immediately. Thank you. > ======================================================= > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
