You're lucky. No UPS? William
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... I have a 120 gig priv on a single 5.5 box.. Never had a problem when the power goes out and it has to reboot. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing.... Hello. I have been told that Exchange 5.5 with IS bigger than 50G is VERY bad. It means there is big chance the IS won't start after restart..... I am wondering if this is true, meaning, this is an undocument limitation, and should I be afraid to have IS above 70G? The IS is on EMC. The server is very very strong and acts very fast.... Thanks for your time! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:32 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > SIS is maintained per database, not per server. So in moving users > between databases SIS is maintained on a per database basis. When, how > and where you > should opt for additional servers, databases or storage groups is not > a universal formula which can be applied unilaterally. Based on the > information you've provided there is no "right" answer. I know of > organizations with significantly larger databases than 70GB, whether > or not > that is appropriate for the organization you are working with is impossible > to say at this point. > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
