Thank you for all your replies.....I guess I was just curious what everyone else is doing...This has helped a lot.
-----Original Message----- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. You know that's exactly what I told them, but our security guy's patented response is "This is the direction the company is going", I'm not privy to the information apparently. I'm just being told what to do, me and my counter part are not very happy about it. -----Original Message----- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Where are you getting the "separation of duties" part, Eric? I haven't seen anything like that. Although there's enough there (in HIPAA) that is to turn my hair greyer than it already is. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -----Original Message----- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. I don't have any SEC requirements, here its all HIPPA. And their big thing so far is "separation of duties" and "checks and balances". Pretty soon if I need to create a mailbox I'm going to need permission from the security group. :( -----Original Message----- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The SEC is killing me. Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 100% Active Directory 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to access every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to satisfy certain SEC requirements. The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an Exchange 5.5 server. It worked in so far as all the mail went to the mailbox...but...After it got over 1000000 messages outlook didn't do a very good job searching it. So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it. With 500000 messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast. So far so good. I guess my questions is....what is everyone else out there doing to satisfy SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention? Is there a better way? Or Better Software? _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
