I thought the exact same thing.  Spend the money on the hardware instead
of the software.  You might lose some features, but you might gain in
the long run.

William 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jorge Herrera
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so
outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using
Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc
for webmail? This would allow you to use your current hardware with no
expense other than your time and (maybe) a slight learning curve.

-Jorge Herrera

A turn-key solution that you can evaluate would be SME Server
http://www.e-smith.org/  


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Server capacity


I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial
constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper
stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load.
If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have
a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't
set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it
puts on systems.

Erick

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM
Subject: RE: Server capacity


> Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin 
> Blackstone
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Server capacity
>
>
> I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system.
>


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to