MVP: Go fix me a turkey pot pie!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> 
> 
> Or a better one from last year...  Not direct quotes of 
> course, but the jist
> of it is there...
> 
> MS:  Isn't E2K great?
> MVP:  Then why the fsck doesn't this feature work?  When I 
> click on this I
> expect something to happen, it doesn't!  Why the fsck not?
> MS:  Ummmm...  We're working on that...
> MVP:  Have you thought about not releasing a product until all of the
> features work?
> MS cowering behind the podium:  Ummm.. Again, we're working on that...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> 
> 
> Any company that would sit out in the parking lot with the 
> public hanging
> around while they decided the direction of their products 
> would be idiots.
> 
> Why must you look at MVP's as MS lackies? Why cant you look at them as
> advocates for the public? You have heard from a number of 
> MVP's today that
> tell you exactly that, but you refuse to open your mind. In 
> essence saying
> we are all lying.
> 
> Here is how you see it:
> MS: Here is a new feature.
> MVP: That sucks
> MS: But you will tell everyone how great it is
> MVP: OK
> 
> Here is how it really is:
> MS: Here is a new feature.
> MVP: People will not like this. It is too much like the old 
> feature that
> people didn't like and was too hard for them to use.
> MS: OK, thanks for the input. We will look into it.
> MVP: Thanks
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:04 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> 
> 
> This proves my point. These discussions take place in 
> private, not public.
> 
> > Big time.  You should have been in the room with the 
> Outlook MVPs and
> > the Outlook Dev guys last Summit talking about the new security 
> > features.  I feared lives would be lost.
> > 
> > -Ben-
> > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
> > Director of Information Services
> > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
> > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
> > >  
> > >  
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:15 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > 
> > > No kidding. Until you have sat in a room with 10 MVP's 
> and some MS 
> > > development people, you have no idea.
> > > 
> > > Martin Blackstone
> > > Microsoft MVP.
> > > Mmmmm MVP
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:11 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> > > 
> > > 
> > > lol
> > > Thanks for the good laugh.
> > > I have found that the harshest critics of Microsoft 
> products are the 
> > > MVPS themselves.
> > > 
> > > Andy David
> > > Microsoft MVP.
> > > There, is that better?
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Greg Deckler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM
> > > Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast
> > > aspersions as to
> > > > people's attitudes and motivations because everyone is
> > > biased in one
> > > > way or another.
> > > >
> > > > I believe that this is really systemic with regards to the
> > > problems of
> > > > the IT industry as a whole. The entire industry is 
> vendor and tool 
> > > > focused and that is a huge problem in IT. It tends to
> > > polarize people
> > > > such that everyone is grouped into two categories, people
> > > that hate a
> > > > particular vendor or tool and people that love a particular
> > > vendor or
> > > > tool. This is just plain stupid.
> > > >
> > > > The IT industry has some fundamental problems. Microsoft,
> > > as part of
> > > > that industry suffers from some of the same problems as
> > > well as some
> > > > of their own unique deficiencies. Novell has their own
> > > unique issues,
> > > > so does IBM and so does every other vendor in this space.
> > > But it seems
> > > > that you cannot point out these deficiencies without people 
> > > > categorizing and stereotyping you in one way or 
> another. I reject 
> > > > that.
> > > >
> > > > I hate all vendors of software tools equally. I find this
> > > an absolute
> > > > requirement to provide true, unbiased consulting services.
> > > If you were
> > > > to follow my posts on a GroupWise board or a Notes board, you
> > > > would see me make similar arguments regarding the 
> deficiencies of 
> > > > their products and company. However, since I make most of my 
> > > > revenue from Microsoft products and Exchange, I tend to be more 
> > > > active in that area.
> > > >
> > > > And the other thing that REALLY chaps me is people that cast 
> > > > aspersions on others without fessing up to their own
> > > biases. MVP's are
> > > > the worst of this lot. They secretly get direct 
> compensation from 
> > > > Microsoft and then try to pass themselves off as 
> unbiased. But you
> 
> > > > look at their posts and it is obvious that they are simply paid
> > > > advocates for Microsoft and part of their responsibility is 
> > > to vilify
> > > > anyone that says anything negative with regards to 
> Microsoft. And 
> > > > these are the same people that list every last
> > > certification and other
> > > > acronym that they can paste onto the end of their sig, but
> > > you never
> > > > see Microsoft MVP. I wonder why? Microsoft asked me to
> > > become an MVP
> > > > and I told them to go jump in a lake. More people need to take
> > > > this approach and be true consultants, not advocates.
> > > >
> > > > > Are you saying that your own interpretation of your own
> > > attitude is
> > > > > unbiased? Or that your own evaluation of whether or not your 
> > > > > paranioa about how Microsoft are out to get you is unbiased?
> > > > >
> > > > > Rob
> > > > > Also an MVP by the way.
> > > > > Want to throw some mud at me too?
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
> > > > > > Sent: 07 February 2003 11:43
> > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > > Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > And Ed, if I am not mistaken, you are also a Microsoft
> > > MVP,=20  so
> > > > > >whose interpretation is unbiased, mine or yours? =20
> > > > > > > I continue to believe my interpretation of your 
> attitude is 
> > > > > > >more=20  accurate than your defense thereof. =20  
> Ed Crowley 
> > > > > > >MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I  Tech Consultant
> > > > > > > hp Services
> > > > > > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > >=20
> > > >
> > > > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       
> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               
> http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to