Do you see the same issues of Calendar or Contact type public folders looking like IMAP folders and not actual contacts or calendar entries?
-Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uselessthoughts.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:05 PM Subject: Re: New Entourage > It works just fine in E2K. The Entourage help files contain quite a bit of > information, might try reading those for what the expected functionality is. > > > From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:18:53 +0100 > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > Ok, can anyone confirm how it works with E2K? > > > > With 5.5 you get what looks like an IMAP connection... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 06 August 2003 16:41 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > Its designed for E2K or higher > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:37 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > I got the same results you did, using Entourage with an Exchange 5.5 server. > > Does it maybe work better with 2000? > > > > -Peter > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:38 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: New Entourage > > > > > > I myself don't like the Entourage update for Office X. I don't get anything > > more than I did with IMAP it seems. Any public folders that are set to be of > > Calendar type or Contact type don't show up correctly. > > > > Is there a list of specific benefits of the update over just using IMAP? > > > > -Mike Carlson > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.uselessthoughts.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:11 AM > > Subject: RE: New Entourage > > > > > >> I'm thinking about trying out citrix.... > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44 > >>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>> > >>> > >>> So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative? > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:44 PM > >>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>> > >>> I think they did away with Outlook because they were in the > >>> semi-absurd situation of maintaining three entirely different > >>> mail clients for the Mac, none of which made everyone, happy, > >>> and two of which weren't OS X native, so they needed major > >>> upgrades, and were free. I don't find it at all > >>> incomprehensable that they'd concentrate their resources on > >>> the product that generates some revenue. As far as > >>> Entourage's new Exchange awareness goes, it's about what > >>> you'd expect from a point upgrade. > >>> > >>> -Peter > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:25 > >>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>> > >>> > >>> I don't doubt it. That makes perfect business sense. > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:43 AM > >>>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> My personal opinion is that they did away with Outlook for > >>>> the Mac because > >>>> OS X, especially Jaguar (10.2.x) is the first OS with a > >>>> legitimate chance of > >>>> displacing Microsoft from their dominance of the desktop. > >>> It meets the > >>>> requirements of having Microsoft Office (Word/Excel/etc). > >>>> Therefore, the > >>>> only missing app is a full blown Outlook client. Its > >>>> Microsoft's only way to > >>>> stop the tide without giving up their entire Mac offering. > >>>> > >>>> Roger > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > >>>> Sr. Systems Administrator > >>>> Inovis Inc. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:11 AM > >>>>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>>>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> This is more venting than any serious question: > >>>>> > >>>>> What about MAPI? (Outlook for OfficeX-1) > >>>>> What about RPC over HTTP? (I know that would have to be coded > >>>>> from scratch) > >>>>> You must enable IMAP on your Exchange server? > >>>>> > >>>>> Why did they get rid of the Outlook product? Why make an > >>>>> organization with > >>>>> Macs go through so many hoops? It's not like they have to > >>>>> code from scratch. > >>>>> It makes no sense. The whole idea is to make the products > >>>> across both > >>>>> platforms the same or mostly the same. They didn't take Word > >>>>> or Excel, > >>>>> retool it, take out some important features and call it > >>>>> something else, did > >>>>> they? Keerist!! > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:02 PM > >>>>>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>>>>> Subject: Re: New Entourage > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Depends on how one defines Exchange aware. If by Exchange > >>>>>> aware, you mean > >>>>>> 'it's Outlook' then no. If understanding free/busy and > >>>> and automatic > >>>>>> configuration of address book and other account settings to > >>>>>> support Exchange > >>>>>> qualifies, then maybe. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:29:57 -0400 > >>>>>>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>> Subject: RE: New Entourage > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I haven't looked at it yet, but it wouldn't be > >>>>>> Exchange-aware if it was, > >>>>>>> right? When we looked at this for our lone Mac user ~18 > >>>>>> months ago we had to > >>>>>>> settle for the previous version of Outlook and the user had > >>>>>> to switch between > >>>>>>> OSX for Office and OS9 for Outlook since we didn't want to > >>>>>> open up IMAP or > >>>>>>> POP3 for him. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>> List posting FAQ: > >>> http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>>>>> Web Interface: > >>>>>> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > >>>>> ext_mode=&lang=english > >>>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>>>> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>>>> Web Interface: > >>>>> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > >>>> ext_mode=&lang=english > >>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>>> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>>> Web Interface: > >>>> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > >>> ext_mode=&lang=english > >>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>> Web Interface: > >>> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t > >> ext_mode=&lang > >> =english > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> ______________________________________________ > >> This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom > >> this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and > >> please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. > >> > >> > >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >> Web Interface: > >> > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > >> =english > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >> Web Interface: > >> > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > >> =english > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >> Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > > =english > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ______________________________________________ > > This message is private or privileged. If you are not the > > person for whom this message is intended, please delete it > > and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send > > this message to anyone else. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > > =english > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=e > > nglish > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
