On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, W B Hacker wrote: > > From inspection of the archive, I think I see the sort of problem it is > causing for those with less thread-aware MUA's, and am happy to fix > that.
Boggle! How do you expect a thread-aware MUA to deal with your messages sensibly when they have no thread information at all? Let alone "less" thread-aware MUAs. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
