On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > > So what happens when the remote server tries to do a verify on your > > verification. > > And fails, because it's return verify never found a valid 'mail from'... > > That's (one of the reasons) why sender verification is best done (if > at all) with a null sender - which is Exim's default. >
Yeah - so it can break when confronted with BATV. :-/ (I'm not a fan of sender verification, but if you do it, you need to be prepared to fallback to a non-null mail_from.) -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
