On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Marc Sherman wrote: > > > > Yeah - so it can break when confronted with BATV. :-/ > > > > (I'm not a fan of sender verification, but if you do it, you need > > to be prepared to fallback to a non-null mail_from.) > > How does BATV break with sender verification? The sender address will be > BATV-encoded, and the probe will look exactly like a bounce, so it > should succeed, right? >
Most of the time, yes. But I occasionally see some mailing lists and automated $foo that draw from the rfc-2822 headers, and not the envelope. It doesn't happen often, I'll admit :) -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
