Peter Bowyer wrote: > On 05/01/07, Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you'd ask for a personal advise, SORBS is nothing to be trusted as a >> blacklist. > > They have 17 different lists. Is this broad-brush 'advice' to be > applied to all 17? >
Unfortunately, yes. :( I am sorry to tell that, but is you use sorbs as a first line of defense and reject with 5xx on this only, be prepared to reject a bunch of legitimate mails. I prefer to use them on a basis like "if you are listed on sorbs spam and the callout doesn't verify, and you are attaching an image, just forget about sending me mail". So they are useful, no doubt about this, but just cannot be trusted.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
