Drav Sloan wrote: > Marc Sherman wrote: >>> How about the geekspeak "noop"? >> I'd think that that would be more like a comment, and would be surprised >> to see a "noop" condition expanding its arguments for side effects. > > Maybe expand_with_noop or expand_and_ignore? > > I think it'll be tricky to pick a single "verb" that will convey the > effect it has without potential confusion. >
What about nullexpand ?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
