-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[email protected]>, Chip <[email protected]> writes
>If a receiver of campaign emails (that promotes itself as an email >security service) sends bounces to "reply-to" rather than "bounces-to" >as a policy despite bounces-to present in all campaign emails headers, >would this be considered a violation of RFCs? which RFC do you believe defines "bounces-to" ? this header doesn't even make it into the IANA list <http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/message- headers.xhtml#prov-headers> - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBV3Katzu8z1Kouez7EQI+8gCgseAQW60ZmLJtrMaZiLxKxFTLw14An15J 5h8M8akMuFMOZKdVZeWtKWQM =XLse -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
