Chip <[email protected]> (Di 28 Jun 2016 17:18:54 CEST): > I know this question is not specifically germane to Exim but everyone on > this list has extensive experience with bouncing policies. > > If a receiver of campaign emails (that promotes itself as an email security > service) sends bounces to "reply-to" rather than "bounces-to" as a policy > despite bounces-to present in all campaign emails headers, would this be > considered a violation of RFCs?
Bounces should go to the Envelope sender of the triggering message.
The Envelope sender doesn't need to be identical to the Reply-To: or the
address found in the From: header. (Reply-To and From may even contain
more than one address, the Envelope sender carries exactly one address
(which may be empty, in case it's a bounce already)))
I've never heard of a Bounces-To Header.
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
