So the Wikipedia article basically suggests there are many variants.
Interesting. It's been my experience that almost all mail systems honor
the bounces-to (which *sometimes* is based off the From or Reply-To
unless the field bounces-to is set in the headers, it seems.)
Notice the samples below which prove out my point in that regard:
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
From: "Everyday Food - MarthaStewart.com"
<[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
From: Stan <[email protected]>
Bounces-To: [email protected]
On 06/28/2016 05:03 PM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Chip <[email protected]> (Di 28 Jun 2016 21:59:35 CEST):
My mistake NOT "bounces-to" rather "return-path" as in the following snippet
of campaign emails from Home Depot, Martha Stewart and Sears:
Maybe this helps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_address
And reading the above article I just learned that my terminology
was wrong too, 'envelope from' I meant where I used 'envelope sender'.
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
