Chip <[email protected]> (Di 28 Jun 2016 23:15:03 CEST): > So the Wikipedia article basically suggests there are many variants. > Interesting. It's been my experience that almost all mail systems honor the > bounces-to (which *sometimes* is based off the From or Reply-To unless the > field bounces-to is set in the headers, it seems.)
I still do not see any Bounces-To header mentioned there. > Notice the samples below which prove out my point in that regard: > > Return-path: <[email protected]> > Envelope-to: [email protected] > From: "Everyday Food - MarthaStewart.com" > <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > > Return-path: <[email protected]> > Envelope-to: [email protected] > From: Stan <[email protected]> > Bounces-To: [email protected] They're free to use any header they want… Maybe some broken mail sysstems even hounour Bounces-To. But please, show me, which relevant RFC mentions this header. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE - ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
