Twilek <[email protected]> (Mi 21 Dez 2016 00:12:54 CET): … > I have to admit that your answers are a bit beyond the horizon of my > knowledge of the SMTP protocol (or other mail protocols :-) ), but I have > gathered from your replies that somehow horde does not follow the RFCs for > SMTP correctly. > So would it be good idea to take this up with the horde devs again with the > information you provided?
Yes.
I'm resurrecting my BDAT tester, as I had some other issue and built a
small perl script for testing. This tester you may feed with huuge data
then to check, if Exim miscounts. [But today it's late already, so
probably tomorrow…]
I'm not sure, how easy it is, to re-count the bytes from a package
capture dump. To now for sure, if we (Exim), or they (Horde) miss
something.
And yes, thank you for the kudos :)
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
